Wow, this is a webcam!!! Remotely controllable and very fast.
April 2003
Untitled
Don't miss the "Just for you Daniel" alternate stylesheet on Tantek's blog.
Tuesday 29 April 2003
Untitled
- Create a new folder on your hard disk
- Rename it "George Bush"
- Move it to the trash
- Empty the trash
- Let the computer ask you "Do you really want to delete 'George Bush' ?"
- Stay calm and answer firmly "Yes".
Untitled
The more I write on these guys when I read such articles, the more the only word I can think of is "shame".
Untitled
Ian, why don't you contribute to Composer instead of showing that you don't know how hard it is to do what you write here?
Karl, tu serais tout à fait surpris si tu posais la question "à quoi sert de déprécier dans une spec du W3C?" aux participants du W3C. Je tiens à te préciser que plusieurs membres de WG, hors du CSS WG, avec qui je suis en discussion courante, et qui sont accessoirement des éditeurs de WD, sont entièrement d'accord avec moi. De plus, je trouve que pour quelqu'un qui m'explique que je dois relativiser mes propos qui sont mal perçus, le terme de "connerie" à mon endroit et celui de navire.net fait vraiment grosse tâche.
Bon sang de nom de zeus, j'ai vraiment l'impression que tu viens de te payer ma fiole en public pour pas un cent de dollar canadien, merci encore. La petite phrase finale d'apaisement contrebalance très difficilement le lourd sentiment d'attaque directe.
A propos, extrait d'un de tes commentaires sur navire.net:
"En fait, le discours de Daniel et du tien, est plus qu’élistite, car il propose une obligation de taper le code à la main. Donc je confirme vous avez un discours élitiste, il ne faut pas se tromper."
Désolé, tu as vraiment tout faux. Et je ne crois pas que je travaillerais sur un éditeur wysisyg de markup si je pensais comme tu le crois.
- Throw the video-recorder to the trash,
- Has anybody recorded "CIA, guerres secrètes" documentary and willing to send me a VHS copy? I'll pay back for the tape and post, of course. Drop me a mail if you can, thanks a lot.
Friday 25 April 2003
Untitled
"President Bush today raised the possibility that Saddam Hussein's government destroyed the prohibited chemical and biological weapons that were the justification for the U.S. invasion of Iraq."
Source: CNN.com
Untitled
- because the insertion of line-break through a <br/> in the middle of a text node, breaking that node in two, does not change the list of ancestors of the two resulting text nodes. Same line-break using <l> changes it,
- because <l> is by definition a block-level element and one may want to insert a line-break into an inline-level element like a span,
- because the "l" element introduces two line breaks, one before, one after. <br/> introduces only one, itself.
Thursday 24 April 2003
Untitled
Just one remark, following a few private mails I just exchanged with Shane McCarron from HTML WG. The "U" element was deprecated by HTML 4.0, and the HTML 4.0 Strict DTD got rid of "B" and "I" and "B" and "I" are considered ugly by the purists of the Web. That was in 1997. We are 6 years later... The web is still full of B, I and U and I see nothing right now that can make that change so significantly it could trigger a "strict-ification" of the World Wide Web as we use it daily.
So, what was the point deprecating?
It just seems that users did not get the signal, that users (I really mean web authors here) did not want to get the signal.
So what's the Web really, and why do we see there two antithetic groups, gurus of strictness and semantic web opposed to people accepting presentation-oriented markup? Corollary, why can't the two of them coexist? Corollary, why is XHTML 2.0 intended to replace HTML 4 some time in the future? Corollary, why XHTML contains "HTML" in its name? The future of the Web should be built over HTML 5.0 and something new, totally independant from HTML.
And forget about deprecation. Things are used or are not. Deprecating unused things is pointless, deprecating things that people do use on a daily basis is counter-productive.
Untitled
Blonda hår, stora bröst, men bara en nervcell. Jag kan inte tro systrarna Graaf är "Time European Heroes".
Wednesday 23 April 2003
Untitled
Still thinking that the renaming of "french fries" and "french bread" to "freedom fries" and "freedom bread" is the supreme peak of human stupidity, I made a small bookmarklet changing all occurences of "freedom" into "french" in a web page. Works in both Gecko-based browsers and Internet Explorer.
Kind of a "bork bork bork" extension to my browser 
Untitled
glazman at NETSCAPE dot com thanks even more pioch at NETSCAPE dot com.

Ben Goodger finally sold his car, the one having a photo of Kate Bosworth Naked. He kept the photo of Kate Bosworth Naked, but we miss the car. Ben, we hope you take Kate Bosworth Naked to California.
Untitled
Tantek, the new style of your blog is very hard to read. You should try green foreground and green background too 
Untitled
glazman at NETSCAPE dot com sends a ton of thanks to nitot at NETSCAPE dot com.
Look at the navigation on this site. Click on links, visit the site. I like that navigation, it's great. Innovative and impressive.
Untitled
Mat should not need to tag elements with "pair" and "impair" classes. :nth-child(odd) and :nth-child(even) should be here to do it.
This bookmarklet is absolutely wonderful. Document Inspector should show when the computed value differs from the initial value.
NCSA Mosaic was announced exactly ten years ago, the 22nd of April 1993. Nothing related to the entry below 
Monday 21 April 2003
Untitled
Netscape died monday the 14th of April 2003. There are still a few spasmodic muscular contractions but they will disappear quite fast. That's a premeditated murder. The killer was promoted just a few days before his act. Of course.
- you're lucky Arte shows once again the documentary "CIA, secret wars" the 27 at 1:55am... This is the best documentary ever shown on TV and the video-recorder just broke for that one.
- fix the f*cking video-recorder!
Wednesday 16 April 2003
Untitled
After a quite long IRC chat with fantasai and Ian Hickson, I finally see some interest in the l element.
Well, not really, since I still think ol/li and div are enough,
but I can live with it 
I think the WD introduced a very big confusion speaking of lines: the l element represents, I quote the WD, "a single line of text". Some people read this line as "line of poetry" or "line of program", some others read it as "visual line".
So a line (l element) is not a line (of poetry) is not a line (well, a line).
I strongly recommend (a) a clarification of the definition of the l element (b) another name, this one being too confusing with 1 and i, and intrinsicly too confusing because a "line" has multiple meanings in English having different visual rendering (and that's not the case in other languages).
This element meant to serve as a replacement for <br/>, I still think it will too drastically complexify wysiwyg editors. I still totally disagree with the removal of <br/>.
Don't miss Arte tv channel tonight, they'll show a remarkable documentary about the CIA.
Untitled
I have redesigned the Glazblog. There are some differences between Gecko-based browsers, Opera, MSIE and MacIE mostly because only Gecko is smart enough to handle CSS based menus.
It's sunny, warm, and I enjoyed my Honda NTV 650cc today. It really does not seem to be a bad day. Unfortunately, it is. A very bad one, indeed.
Tuesday 15 April 2003
Untitled
Through boing boing blog, I found this ad on www.sunday.com:

Untitled
l element should be removed from
XHTML 2.0- It is a presentational element, it represents nothing but a line. A line is defined by its rendering and nothing else. From that point of view, it's not less presentational that the <br> element,
- The name of the element is terrible. Will lead to confusion
between
l,1andi, - It is useful only when you have a list of adjacent lines. So
it's basically a list (
ulorol) with list items (li) having no marker and no wrapping, - Using
ul/ol/liinstead oflmakes it much easier to number lines since you have a known container to reset the numbering in CSS.
Monday 14 April 2003
42 reasons why I don't like XHTML 2.0. Now, Karl, happy ?
This has been sent to www-html@w3.org and www-html-editor@w3.org
- the lack of DTD is a very big problem. The HTML WG should not release other XHTML WD without DTD.
- the head element should not exist any more. It's a useless container for metadata.
- the body element should not exist any more. It's a useless container for data since we already have the root of the document.
- the xml-stylesheet PI and the link element are conflicting
- the link element and the src attribute on the style element are conflicting
- metadata meta elements are only allowed at document's level but can't be scoped on a per-element basis
- stylesheets can't be scoped on a per-element basis
- deprecating h1-h6 is a performance hit for web browsers. If the h
element is introduced with the section element, a default stylesheet for
XHTML 2.0 will need
section > h { ... } section > section >h { ... } section > section > section > h { ... } ...and that's _considerably_ slower than
h1 { ... } ... h6 { ... }More generally, I am under the impression that browser performance has not been taken under consideration for the design of XHTML 2.0.
- I do not understand how the DTD will reflect the modularization
- the definition of deprecated is not normative
- the title attribute has a special meaning for the link element and therefore cannot serve as an extra advisory information. Title and alternate style set should be independent.
- the notion of linguistic root of a word added as a note here seems to me completely crazy.
- the definition of the dir attribute is exactly what I called in my previous messages a normative definition of an xhtml attribute using a css redundancy. If it can be done there, it can be done elsewhere. For example the edit attribute where the prose assigns the default rendering 'display: none' to 'edit="deleted"'.
- by the way, that default rendering of 'display: none' for 'edit="deleted"' is valid only for browsing environments. In an editing environment, the default rendering of 'edit="deleted"' would probably be 'text-decoration: line-through; color: red' or something equivalent.
- the Datetime format is not defined in the WD
- the definition of the href attribute does not say what means 'activated'
- how can be specified the language of an object designated by a cite attribute ?
- I don't understand why access-key is in XHTML2. In the XHTML2 spirit as described in the introduction of the document, it should not be here. Furthermore, system-dependant and language-dependant common practices make this completely unusable.
- the navindex attribute seems to me the worst choice of all for
that feature. Having this defined by an integer is a design mistake in a
structured XML-based world. This should be defined by ID and an IDREF:
<table> <tr><td href="a" nextlink="link2">NW</td> <td href="c" id="link3" nextlink="link4">NE</td></tr> <tr><td href="b" id="link2" nextlink="link3">SW</td> <td href="d" id="link4">SE</td></tr> </table>
- as I said above in item 4, the src attribute conflicts with other element.
- I find the nl element useless.
- the duplication of the title element is a closed issue if the head and body elements are removed (see items 1 and 2 above)
- I am still completely opposed to the l element. The manipulation of this element in wysiwyg editors will be too hard in comparison with the existing <br> in HTML4. If you really want to extract presentation from the markup here, use a processing instruction <?line-break?> instead of <br>.
- don't introduce the nr element, reuse MathML if that's really needed.
- the address element should be improved, I agree. But not using the l element has it has often been proposed. That's not enough.
- the cite element is not needed, it is redundant with an anchor having something like rel=cite (for instance).
- removing the hr element is counter-productive; renaming it is useless, keep it simple and stupid.
- the modification of the model of the paragraph p element will drastically impact editing environements. Most editors rely on the inline/block discrimination to handle user input, in particular when the user presses the Enter key. I see this change as a nice structural change, unfortunately totally overkill for vendors. You can't say at the same time "XHTML 2.0 will be edited by tools and not by hand" and complexify that way the language so that editors will hardly handle it.
- in the spirit of XHTML 2.0, the pre element should not exist. The non-collapsable spaces should be and the lines should be materialized by <br> or <l> element. I am, as I said above, completely opposed to <l> and I am in favor of keeping <pre>.
- if an element carries both the href attribute and the cite attribute, how can the link to the cite URI be activated?
- an h element child of the body is redundant with a title element child of body as in item 21.
- sub and sup elements are purely presentational and do not carry any semantics
- the a element is useless since any element can carry an href attribute.
- if the a element is preserved, it should not serve as source AND target of a link. Named anchors should be removed from the spec and only an ID should allow to target an element using an URL with a fragment id.
- the label element should be called title and should be allowed in ul/ol/dl. I already said that I find nl useless.
- the lack of the value and start attributes on ol and li elements are a major mistake extensively discussed in www-style@w3.org.
- section 15.2.4 is just a denial of the progressive rendering... Does the HTML WG really think that browsers are not going to start rendering very long documents if the network makes the retrieval too long from a user's perspective? This parargraph seems to me unapplicable in dynamic environments.
- just for the record, the lack of style attribute is a major error, recently fixed by the HTML and the CSS WG jointly.
- the style and link elements still lack a disabled attribute. Please note that this attribute **is** in DOM Level 2 Style.
- the removal of the "_blank" value for the target attribute seems to me an error.
- why isn't XFrames merged with XHTML 2.0 ?
- I still think that the removal of B, I and U is a major error for the Web. One may want to annotate visually a document without adding any semantic.
References:
- [0] http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml2/xhtml2.html#a_xhtml20_dtd_issue_0
- [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml2/xhtml2.html#sec_7.2.
- [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml2/xhtml2.html#sec_7.4.
- [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml2/xhtml2.html#styleSheet_external
- [4] http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml2/xhtml2.html#sec_12.1.
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml2/xhtml2.html#adef_attribute-collections_src - [5] http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml2/xhtml2.html#sec_13.1.
- [6] http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml2/xhtml2.html#s_styleSheetmodule
- [7] http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml2/xhtml2.html#s_textmodule_issue_4
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml2/xhtml2.html#edef_text_h - [9] http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml2/xhtml2.html#a_terms
- [10] http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml2/xhtml2.html#col_Core
- [11] http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml2/xhtml2.html#s_attribute-collectionsmodule_issue_0
- [12] http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml2/xhtml2.html#col_Bi-directional
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml2/xhtml2.html#col_Edit - [13] http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml2/xhtml2.html#col_Edit
- [14] http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml2/xhtml2.html#col_Edit
- [15] http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml2/xhtml2.html#col_Hypertext
- [16] http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml2/xhtml2.html#col_Hypertext
- [17] http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml2/xhtml2.html#col_Hypertext
- [18] http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml2/xhtml2.html#col_Hypertext
- [19] http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml2/xhtml2.html#col_Embedding
- [20] http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml2/xhtml2.html#sec_10.2.
- [21] http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml2/xhtml2.html#s_structuremodule_issue_2
- [22] http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml2/xhtml2.html#sec_8.12.
- [23] http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml2/xhtml2.html#s_textmodule_issue_2
- [24] http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml2/xhtml2.html#sec_8.2.
- [25] http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml2/xhtml2.html#sec_8.4.
- [26] http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml2/xhtml2.html#s_textmodule_issue_5
- [27] http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml2/xhtml2.html#sec_8.13.
- [28] http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml2/xhtml2.html#sec_8.14.
- [29] http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml2/xhtml2.html#col_Hypertext
- [30] http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml2/xhtml2.html#edef_text_h
- [31] http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml2/xhtml2.html#sec_8.20.
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml2/xhtml2.html#sec_8.21. - [32] http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml2/xhtml2.html#sec_9.1.
- [33] http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml2/xhtml2.html#sec_9.1.
- [34] http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml2/xhtml2.html#sec_10.5.
- [35] http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml2/xhtml2.html#s_listmodule
- [36] http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml2/xhtml2.html#sec_15.2.4.
- [38] http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml2/xhtml2.html#sec_16.1.
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml2/xhtml2.html#sec_12.1.
http://www.w3.org/TR/DOM-Level-2-Style/stylesheets.html#StyleSheets-StyleSheet - [39] http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml2/xhtml2.html#col_Hypertext
- [40] http://www.w3.org/TR/xframes/
42 (bad permalinks), Dylan Schiemann (no permalink), Conforme, Dreams4Net, Karl Dubost, Karl Dubost (2),
Untitled
Bush has declared today "Freedom is beautiful". I wonder if he applied s/French/Freedom/g before saying that 
Untitled
Si mes souvenirs sont bons, silicon.fr c'était un des webzines de la néo-économie des plus minables. Ils racontaient n'importe quoi, et leurs analyses étaient minables. Après avoir fait leurs adieux à la scène, ils reviennent. *sigh* Dans l'hyperespace, personne ne vous entend crier.
Untitled
A neighbour of mine thinks that the SARS epidemy is more or less something not very important that the journalists make important to have something to talk about, besides Iraq... Well, let's think about it. Its global lethality is about 10% and its specific lethality among doctors and nurses reaches 30% in some places. It has reached Africa and Japan. Airports are now dangerous places, where just crossing the path of someone coming from an infected place and breathing the same air can kill. A lot of doctors here in France, and in particular the ones who survived the outbreak in Hanoï, think it will reach Western Europe. The only good thing is that they think the epidemy could stop with the end of winter, giving us time to produce a vaccine before next winter.
Do you know the famous word by Benjamin Disraeli, answering to an antisemitic attack at the british parliament? "Yes, I am a Jew and when the ancestors of the right honourable gentleman were brutal savages in an unknown island, mine were priests in the temple of Solomon.".
Well... When the ancestors of Disraeli (and mine) were brutal savages in an unknown place, Mesopotamia had already given the "Epic of Gilgamesh" to the world.
Last thing, in the Basrah district, Iraqis are building community houses in reed. The model of house they build is more than 4000 years old. Described on ancient tablets. They still use it.
Saturday 12 April 2003
Untitled
Since I posted "partial conclusion", I was looking for a final conclusion, something impacting strongly our societies. I finally found, after a discussion with my father: public opinion is only a concept. It's only worthwhile to journalists who pretend they have some impact on it, and politicians when (and only when) they want to show they respect it.
BTW, when the war started, my father and I were in Spain together; he asked me "when do you think this is going to end ?". I answered very precisely "the 12th of april". Well... Not too bad... Can I recommend CNN to throw away their so-called military experts and hire me ?-)
Friday 11 April 2003
Untitled
I think that the fact nsSelection::MoveCaret() does not check nsFrame::IsSelectable() is the root of my current problems. That's a bug anyway since it allows to place the caret in a frame that's not necessarily selectable...
Alexandre Adler dont je lis en ce moment "Au fil des jours cruels" écrit décidément bien, et ne pense pas que des bêtises. Mais il devrait arrêter de dire méso-Amérique au lieu d'Amérique Centrale, je trouve ça très pêteux.
Untitled
It's 8pm; Maria is sleeping, she has fever, fighting against a bad virus, probably the same I got last week. My little shrimp Gabriel is sleeping, exhausted by pain, two teeth are coming. Michel is sleeping, exhausted because he played all day. 8pm and I am alone in the living room. Wow.
yes my friend, but that's even worse than you think: thisthat company is walking on its head, and it believes it uses its feet.
Untitled
Ganska roligt att läsa Gemal's blog på danska och förstå allt 
Update: Malina (joli prénom) me demande pourquoi je n'écris pas à chaque fois en anglais ET français ET suédois. Malina (nice first name) asks me why I don't post every time in english AND french AND swedish. Malina (fint förenamn) frågar varför jag inte skriver varje gång på engelska OCH franska OCH svenska.
Malina, you want to kill me or what ?-)
I am looking for the etymology of the name Evros (or Ebros depending on your transliteration), region of Greece. Drop me a mail please if you know about it.
Thursday 10 April 2003
Untitled
The most beautiful aircraft in he world, the only intercontinental aircraft having a name, will disappear from our skies before the end of the year. Sad day.
By the way, the CNN.com article linked above fails to mention that the tire burst because a Continential aircraft lost on the take-off track a piece of metal just minutes before Concorde's take-off. As an investigation from the french TV showed it, that piece of metal had been replaced by Continental Airlines just a few days before Concorde's crash. In front of the camera, a manager from Continental Maintenance team recognized the part was not the one they had to use. They used another similar one, but made in a different alloy, weaker and cheaper. 113 people died in Concorde's crash in July 2000 mostly because Continental Airlines used a $100 part instead of a $200. Deserved to be mentioned, I think...
Watched Arte yesterday night (for me, all TV channels could disappear but that one) and the documentary "The Dark Side of Henry Kissinger". Very interesting. Very scary.
Wednesday 9 April 2003
Untitled
A few questions that most journalists seem to have forgotten.
- Why was the Iraqi army so dangerous for the security of the whole world?
- Where are the weapons of massive destruction?
- Where are the nuclear materials?
- Where are the proofs that Iraq was linked to Al Quaeda?
Tuesday 8 April 2003
Untitled
Received today a nasty email from someone asking me why I care about the political changes in the US anyway since I live in that fucking country of cheese-lovers, and why I care about the arab-americans since they can go back to where they come from, after all.
Well, since you read this blog and since you asked, you'll get the answer in public, you moron: (a) I work for an american company, I work with a lot of cool people I appreciate, I have a lot of good american friends (b) I like the US, correction, I like what the US were before november 2000 (d) one of my best and oldest friends is an arab-american; he hates the fundamentalists, he is clever, speaks even more languages than I do, has a general knowledge (and a collection of books) I'd love to have. And I'm afraid the asshole at the White House, a clone of yours from a neuronal point of view, could put his name on a lettre de cachet.
Untitled
Vedat Kahyalar, local representative of the AKP Turkish party in Adana, visits a bar after the elections, followed by a cameraman of Arte. He shakes the hand of an old man present in the bar and starts the conversation:
- Did you vote for AKP ?
- Oh yes I did! (the man is smiling a lot)
- Good man (now he smiles a lot too). Why did you vote for us ?
- Well, just to try. We already tried all the other political parties before so...
Shploffff. That's the sound the throat of the politican did at that time. Maria and I laughed a lot.
Untitled
Yves Lafon, grand fournisseur de beignets de fleurs de courgettes au W3C, entame apparemment un tutoriel sur HTTP, sujet qu'il maîtrise plus que bien. C'est en français, profitez donc...
Untitled
We failed, and that 'we' means all the people involved in standardization, providing Web authors with a simple way of doing simple header+3columns+footer documents without tables. We just gave up, quite long ago, on the basis of false arguments expressed by either so-called gurus living in a world that is not a users' world, or by representatives of industrial interests who did not want to spend 2 weeks of time of an engineer to work on a quite simple solution. This is enough. I am bringing back that subject on the standardization table, with the firm intention to make CSS 3 have a super-simple solution to this problem.
The US are turning themselves into an extreme-rightist country at an interesting fast rate these days. Read this, and this. I think they will easily make the top cover of Amnesty International report this year.
Monday 7 April 2003
Untitled
- Alexandre Adler, "Au fil des jours cruels".
- Thorvald Steen, "Constantinople".
warning: "Reading this week" will come back...every week
It does not mean anything about the quality of the book. It's just the book I have with me those days in the train.
Untitled
Time Magazine, European edition, pages 24 and 25. Title: "The agony of a child". The photo takes all of the two pages. A young boy. 10 years old probably. His arms are both gone. He is burned black on half his body. He does not yet know that all his family died in the bombing.
What are you going to say to that child, misters Bush and Rumsfeld?
Saturday 5 April 2003
Untitled
Reuters, December 10, 2003, 4:36 PM EST (09:36 PM GMT).
Nearly seven months after the fall of Saddam Hussein and the victory of the forces of the coalition against the Iraqi troops, the controversy over the "second Gulf war" makes an unexpected come back. In a very unusual act of political defiance, the Norwegian Nobel Committee and its five members awarded the Nobel Peace Prize 2003 to...France!
Some rumors, immediately contradicted by a Nobel Committee's spokesperson, gave last week the French President Jacques Chirac and his Foreign Minister Dominique de Villepin as possible winners. The spokesman of the White House commented that rumor by the single word "ridiculous".
The Nobel Committee did not explain what motivated the choice since its statutes do not allow to disclose such information, but in another very strong act, it issued during the evening a press release explaining that the Nobel Committee is completely independent and that it denies any government to interfer with its choices. While no reason was officially provided, this warning is probably linked to the intense lobbying done last week in Norway against France by US political and industrial representatives on behalf of the Bush administration.
In his speech, right after the King Harald V of Norway gave him the Prize, the French ambassador Louis Amigues said that "this war was useless, war is a failure". He regretted that the US decision to start the war "put the United Nations in the background at a time we need more global consensus for the benefit of all". The American and British embassadors showed their disagreement remaining seated while the other attendees were standing up, applauding L. Amigues.
Untitled
Do not blog when you are above 39.5° of fever. And thanks Mike.
Wednesday 2 April 2003
Untitled
...is out. Available from Mozilla.org home page. Just one important detail: the announcement there says that dynamic image and table resizing is enabled in Composer; that's incomplete: it's enabled in HTML email too....
Untitled
USA, country of the freedom of speech and freedom of press, country that tells the other countries that they don't have a real freedom of speech nor freedom of press. Well, not really. Shame, shame, shame.
Tuesday 1 April 2003
Untitled
The China International Forum on WWW scheduled for april is postponed sine die. I bet this is because of the SARS disease. This is not a 1st of April joke, unfortunately...
It's 2:34am and I'm coding. A geek's life... In the background, the tv is running. Kubrick's Clockwork Orange just finished on Arte and I switched to Sonya Rykiel's fashion show on Tf1... The clothes are really superb but the models are so thin that they give the impression they could break at each step! These girls could be pretty with ten more kilos but they really look like anorexic packs of bones with only the skin around.

