Paf la clé
By glazou on Monday 10 April 2006, 17:38 - Computing - Permalink
My dad is writing a new book in yiddish. He wrote the previous one with Microsoft Word 2000 and found a few annoying bugs when dealing with rtl text and styles.
I bought a license of MS Word 2003 for him but unfortunately bought it in en-US, completely forgetting that Word is not localizable in another language (yeah, that's called modern software). And he wants a french UI... So I installed Abiword and OOo for him, and tried to configure them for rtl use with a yiddish font.
Results : although its UI is perfectly customizable, Abiword is totally unusable with big documents imported from MS Word. I tried to import a very simple (in terms of styles) 200 pages yiddish document using one single font... The UI freezes so often it's not usable : takes 2 minutes to load, freezes when you resize the window, freezes when you scroll too fast.
OOo has no problem of that sort : loading the doc is fast, and it's easy to work with a 200+ pages doc. The UI customization is too complex, and not easily accessible to newbies ; in my opinion, it should be improved. But OOo Writer is definitely an excellent choice, and my father now uses it.

Comments
I believe it would be technically very easy for Microsoft to make those soft localizable. But then customer could buy it where it's cheaper, and then localize it to their needs.
It's great that OOo is that performant with large document, even when they use rtl. I'm not sure Mozilla can say the same, I remember a bug about dismayal performances when editing in textboxes with long text string with a mix of language direction.
Actually it is possible to change the UI of MS Office using the Multilingual User Interface Pack:
office.microsoft.com/en-g...
Office compatibility is more of a checklist item than an actual feature of abiword. It's not really expected that people who actually use Office formats will use abi on a daily basis, much like it's not expected that human being will use the GIMP.
- Chris
Les réserves concernant l'interface d'OOo rejoignent celles que tu avais à l'endroit de celles de Gimp. Entièrement d'accord, il y a du progrès à faire là-dessus. Personnellement je ne supporte guère de travailler dans ce genre de "cliquodrome"… Dommage car pour le reste ce sont d'excellents softs…